<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writelife &#187; social networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writelife.net/tag/social-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writelife.net</link>
	<description>asking questions and discovering how little I know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook grabs FriendFeed: a speculation festival</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/08/11/facebook-grabs-friendfeed-a-speculation-festival/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/08/11/facebook-grabs-friendfeed-a-speculation-festival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writelife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=1583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With just about everyone weighing in on the Facebook acquisition of FriendFeed, I thought I&#8217;d add to the noise and toss in my riveting insight (or lack thereof). First of all, I&#8217;ve no idea what it means. But then, no &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/08/11/facebook-grabs-friendfeed-a-speculation-festival/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/08/11/facebook-grabs-friendfeed-a-speculation-festival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is using Twitter and why?</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/04/11/who-is-using-twitter-and-why/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/04/11/who-is-using-twitter-and-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=1097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook is used by shoals of people (to steal a term Kurt Vonnegut liked to use). Twitter&#8217;s growth is always &#8220;surprising&#8221; (although, by now, the real surprise would be if it stopped). For me, however, what is most interesting is &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/04/11/who-is-using-twitter-and-why/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/04/11/who-is-using-twitter-and-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs aren’t dead because they didn’t exist to begin with</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/04/06/blogs-aren%e2%80%99t-dead-because-they-didn%e2%80%99t-exist-to-begin-with/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/04/06/blogs-aren%e2%80%99t-dead-because-they-didn%e2%80%99t-exist-to-begin-with/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew keen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=1082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had an interesting back-and-forth on Twitter with Andrew Keen (@ajkeen) after he posted a tweet that roughly read, &#8220;Blogs aren&#8217;t dying &#8211; they&#8217;re dead.&#8221; I tweeted back something about them not being dead and included a link to an &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/04/06/blogs-aren%e2%80%99t-dead-because-they-didn%e2%80%99t-exist-to-begin-with/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/04/06/blogs-aren%e2%80%99t-dead-because-they-didn%e2%80%99t-exist-to-begin-with/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crotch &#8211; the tactile social network</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/02/21/crotch-the-tactile-social-network/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/02/21/crotch-the-tactile-social-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m working with a team developing a new social networking tool tentatively called Crotch. We expect to compete with Facebook and Twitter. Given the rapid growth of both, and the deep roots each has developed in a short time, you &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/02/21/crotch-the-tactile-social-network/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/02/21/crotch-the-tactile-social-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook, content, ownership: the brouhaha</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/02/19/facebook-content-ownership-the-brouhaha/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/02/19/facebook-content-ownership-the-brouhaha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two thoughts on the hubbub around Facebook&#8217;s terms and conditions and the backtracking on the revised version: 1) What if Facebook users wrote their own terms and conditions and include in it an assertion that not only do they own &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/02/19/facebook-content-ownership-the-brouhaha/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/02/19/facebook-content-ownership-the-brouhaha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

