<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writelife &#187; social network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writelife.net/tag/social-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writelife.net</link>
	<description>asking questions and discovering how little I know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google makes social media interesting again</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2011/07/26/google-makes-social-media-interesting-again/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2011/07/26/google-makes-social-media-interesting-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew keen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artifact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bradley horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communicate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial expressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vic gundotra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writelife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=4013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found myself wondering if Google might be the first company to actually get social media by focusing on the word social and realizing something was lacking in a big way in the world of social networks and technology generally. &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2011/07/26/google-makes-social-media-interesting-again/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2011/07/26/google-makes-social-media-interesting-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dueling social networks: Google+ and Facebook</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2011/07/22/dueling-social-networks-google-and-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2011/07/22/dueling-social-networks-google-and-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early adopters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guesswork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=3977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I&#8217;m using Google+ I know absolutely nothing about it. And I&#8217;ve yet to find the time to really explore it. The comforting thing is knowing that no one else knows anything about it. Everything is speculation. People using it &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2011/07/22/dueling-social-networks-google-and-facebook/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2011/07/22/dueling-social-networks-google-and-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear 2010</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/12/31/dear-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/12/31/dear-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Burbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dignity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=1954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#8217;t mind, I would like to make a few requests of you. While I don&#8217;t wish to appear dogmatic and inflexible, and if I may be blunt, you are of absolutely no use or merit to me should &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/12/31/dear-2010/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/12/31/dear-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook grabs FriendFeed: a speculation festival</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/08/11/facebook-grabs-friendfeed-a-speculation-festival/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/08/11/facebook-grabs-friendfeed-a-speculation-festival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writelife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=1583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With just about everyone weighing in on the Facebook acquisition of FriendFeed, I thought I&#8217;d add to the noise and toss in my riveting insight (or lack thereof). First of all, I&#8217;ve no idea what it means. But then, no &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/08/11/facebook-grabs-friendfeed-a-speculation-festival/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/08/11/facebook-grabs-friendfeed-a-speculation-festival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crotch &#8211; the tactile social network</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/02/21/crotch-the-tactile-social-network/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/02/21/crotch-the-tactile-social-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m working with a team developing a new social networking tool tentatively called Crotch. We expect to compete with Facebook and Twitter. Given the rapid growth of both, and the deep roots each has developed in a short time, you &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/02/21/crotch-the-tactile-social-network/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/02/21/crotch-the-tactile-social-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook, content, ownership: the brouhaha</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2009/02/19/facebook-content-ownership-the-brouhaha/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2009/02/19/facebook-content-ownership-the-brouhaha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two thoughts on the hubbub around Facebook&#8217;s terms and conditions and the backtracking on the revised version: 1) What if Facebook users wrote their own terms and conditions and include in it an assertion that not only do they own &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2009/02/19/facebook-content-ownership-the-brouhaha/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2009/02/19/facebook-content-ownership-the-brouhaha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter: an observation</title>
		<link>http://writelife.net/2008/12/02/twitter-an-observation/</link>
		<comments>http://writelife.net/2008/12/02/twitter-an-observation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frequency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writelife.net/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I look at Twitter, I notice that of the people I follow, most &#8220;tweet&#8221; once or twice a day but a few &#8220;tweet&#8221; many times during the day. In fact, there are so many tweets I don&#8217;t look at &#8230; <a href="http://writelife.net/2008/12/02/twitter-an-observation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://writelife.net/2008/12/02/twitter-an-observation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

